We heard about this far out looney toon on the Glenn Beck show tonight. This nut case thinks that a chicken should have it's own lawyer and be able to sue! I quote "...believes that in taking steps to promote litigation on behalf of animals ..." I'm not kidding. He believes that eating meat should be banned, that hunting should be banned, that cosmetic testing should be banned and it goes on and on! It pains me to see that Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) released his hold on Cass's confirmation!
"Hey, Saxby, YOU ARE SO GONE!!! Start packing your office Bubba because we are gonna kick out OUT OF OFFICE!"
This guy is so crazy he should be in the nut house. "He is the gatekeeper between the president and the secretaries," he said, noting that "as a regulatory czar, he won't be a judge or a legislator, so he cannot make laws. ... What he can do is nudge the departments in the direction of his philosophy," which is very much in line with "hard core animal rights zealots."
And get this scary little scenerio ... if another Justice retires, Cass Sunstein is in the line up to be on the Supreme Court! He would be one of the ruling masters of the land.
Here's a couple of articles on Cass Sustein: Fox News and the Wall Street Journal.
Please y'all keep praying, calling, writing, and protesting. Hope to see ya 9-12 at a Tea Party!!
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Obama's New Radical "Regulatory Czar"
More Obama Corruption ~ The Crooked Chicago Private Equity Fund
Wonder where a lot of Obamanation's money is coming from? Crooked unions. And that's why he's trying so desperately TO CREATE MORE UNIONS, and the ones we have, make them stronger. Read this story and it'll all come crystal clear.
And remember this is just a tip of the corruption iceberg with the lunatic fringe that are now ruling in our White House.
And why, oh WHY is this not being reported on the main stream media?? Huh?
Aw well, here is the article:
OutFront
Why Several Unions Invested in One Fund
Daniel Fisher, 07.15.09, 06:00 PM EDT
Forbes Magazine dated August 03, 2009
Why did so many unions invest in a crooked Chicago private equity fund? And why does this keep happening?
There's not much mystery about why the Detroit branch of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters invested $77 million in a crooked Chicago "private equity" fund called AA Capital a few years ago. AA Capital's cofounder, John Orecchio, bribed the union's former executive secretary-treasurer Walter R. Mabry, according to a recent federal indictment of a third man allegedly involved in the scheme. (Orecchio himself wasn't indicted.)
That doesn't necessarily explain why Millwrights Local 1102 wired $8.3 million of its $150 million pension fund to the same crooked fund, however. Or why International Operating Engineers Local 324 and the Michigan Teamsters Joint Council 43 also invested with AA Capital.
All told, six regional union funds entrusted $164 million with Orecchio, a former ABN Amro investment banker, between 2002 and 2005. Orecchio allegedly blew much of the money on personal expenditures, Super Bowl tickets, a Detroit strip joint he owned and a disastrous investment in a sport-drink company affiliated with the Ultimate Fighting Championship franchise owned by the Fertitta brothers of Las Vegas.
Merrill Lynch was a financial advisor to several of the unions and has been accused by the Millwrights of promoting AA Capital. Merrill denies the charges and says the union trustees insisted on investing in AA Capital.
The bigger question: Why does this keep happening to union pension funds? And why doesn't it happen to funds for union officials, which are separate from those the officials run for the rank and file?
Take the Operating Engineers. The pension fund for top officials in its Washington headquarters has $85 million for 401 participants, or $209,000 apiece. It is 108% funded. Local 324's $1.4 billion rank-and-file fund has 18,000 participants, or $79,000 per head, and is 81% funded. Some of the difference can be explained by boneheaded investments like the $60 million Local 324 put into AA Capital or the $28 million it sank into rebuilding a Detroit office building that it sold for $4.5 million in 2004.
None of the unions would discuss their investment in AA Capital, so it isn't clear how they all came to believe in Orecchio's abilities as a private equity manager. Orecchio, who recently attempted suicide, did not respond to calls made to his attorney for comment. In court filings he has acknowledged having caused $60 million in losses. Mabry was sentenced to jail on unrelated felony charges in 2006.
The Carpenters first invested in AA Capital in 2002, when Orecchio had a deal to develop a Hard Rock casino in Biloxi, Miss. In its lawsuit against Merrill Lynch, the Millwrights union, which is associated with the Carpenters union, says a Merrill senior vice president promoted AA Capital. Orecchio, in turn, is accused of plying Merrill's brokers with entertainment, including lap dances by strippers. Merrill says it didn't advise the unions to invest in AA Capital and made no fees or commissions from it.
The Hard Rock investment was profitable only because Hurricane Katrina wiped out the site. [read that again in case it didn't sink in ... and remember who (ACORN) is headquartered there] According to the May 28 indictment of Joseph R. Jewett, a "consultant" allegedly hired at the insistence of Mabry, the union boss got a $267,000 payoff that he rolled into other AA Capital investments. Jewett denies the charges.
Next, the Carpenters and the Operating Engineers invested through AA Capital $32 million in Xyience, the ufc-sponsoring sport-drink company run by a twice-convicted felon named Russell Pike. The outfit ended up in bankruptcy. A receiver recovered about $9 million.
Union members wouldn't know anything about these shenanigans if they hadn't erupted into litigation and a federal indictment. And if the Obama Administration has its way, even some of the limited disclosure forms that require officials to reveal their ties to investment managers and the purchase and sale of assets will be dialed back. It would "not be a good use of resources," the Administration said.
"Can you imagine the IRS saying requiring tax returns is not a good use of resources?" asks Elaine Chao, labor secretary in the Bush Administration. "These are disclosures that potentially would deter embezzlement." [i.e. Obama won't allow them to be prosecuted]
And remember this is just a tip of the corruption iceberg with the lunatic fringe that are now ruling in our White House.
And why, oh WHY is this not being reported on the main stream media?? Huh?
Aw well, here is the article:
OutFront
Why Several Unions Invested in One Fund
Daniel Fisher, 07.15.09, 06:00 PM EDT
Forbes Magazine dated August 03, 2009
Why did so many unions invest in a crooked Chicago private equity fund? And why does this keep happening?
There's not much mystery about why the Detroit branch of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters invested $77 million in a crooked Chicago "private equity" fund called AA Capital a few years ago. AA Capital's cofounder, John Orecchio, bribed the union's former executive secretary-treasurer Walter R. Mabry, according to a recent federal indictment of a third man allegedly involved in the scheme. (Orecchio himself wasn't indicted.)
That doesn't necessarily explain why Millwrights Local 1102 wired $8.3 million of its $150 million pension fund to the same crooked fund, however. Or why International Operating Engineers Local 324 and the Michigan Teamsters Joint Council 43 also invested with AA Capital.
All told, six regional union funds entrusted $164 million with Orecchio, a former ABN Amro investment banker, between 2002 and 2005. Orecchio allegedly blew much of the money on personal expenditures, Super Bowl tickets, a Detroit strip joint he owned and a disastrous investment in a sport-drink company affiliated with the Ultimate Fighting Championship franchise owned by the Fertitta brothers of Las Vegas.
Merrill Lynch was a financial advisor to several of the unions and has been accused by the Millwrights of promoting AA Capital. Merrill denies the charges and says the union trustees insisted on investing in AA Capital.
The bigger question: Why does this keep happening to union pension funds? And why doesn't it happen to funds for union officials, which are separate from those the officials run for the rank and file?
Take the Operating Engineers. The pension fund for top officials in its Washington headquarters has $85 million for 401 participants, or $209,000 apiece. It is 108% funded. Local 324's $1.4 billion rank-and-file fund has 18,000 participants, or $79,000 per head, and is 81% funded. Some of the difference can be explained by boneheaded investments like the $60 million Local 324 put into AA Capital or the $28 million it sank into rebuilding a Detroit office building that it sold for $4.5 million in 2004.
None of the unions would discuss their investment in AA Capital, so it isn't clear how they all came to believe in Orecchio's abilities as a private equity manager. Orecchio, who recently attempted suicide, did not respond to calls made to his attorney for comment. In court filings he has acknowledged having caused $60 million in losses. Mabry was sentenced to jail on unrelated felony charges in 2006.
The Carpenters first invested in AA Capital in 2002, when Orecchio had a deal to develop a Hard Rock casino in Biloxi, Miss. In its lawsuit against Merrill Lynch, the Millwrights union, which is associated with the Carpenters union, says a Merrill senior vice president promoted AA Capital. Orecchio, in turn, is accused of plying Merrill's brokers with entertainment, including lap dances by strippers. Merrill says it didn't advise the unions to invest in AA Capital and made no fees or commissions from it.
The Hard Rock investment was profitable only because Hurricane Katrina wiped out the site. [read that again in case it didn't sink in ... and remember who (ACORN) is headquartered there] According to the May 28 indictment of Joseph R. Jewett, a "consultant" allegedly hired at the insistence of Mabry, the union boss got a $267,000 payoff that he rolled into other AA Capital investments. Jewett denies the charges.
Next, the Carpenters and the Operating Engineers invested through AA Capital $32 million in Xyience, the ufc-sponsoring sport-drink company run by a twice-convicted felon named Russell Pike. The outfit ended up in bankruptcy. A receiver recovered about $9 million.
Union members wouldn't know anything about these shenanigans if they hadn't erupted into litigation and a federal indictment. And if the Obama Administration has its way, even some of the limited disclosure forms that require officials to reveal their ties to investment managers and the purchase and sale of assets will be dialed back. It would "not be a good use of resources," the Administration said.
"Can you imagine the IRS saying requiring tax returns is not a good use of resources?" asks Elaine Chao, labor secretary in the Bush Administration. "These are disclosures that potentially would deter embezzlement." [i.e. Obama won't allow them to be prosecuted]
Monday, September 7, 2009
Congressman Jack Kingston (R-GA) on Your World with Neil Cavuto TODAY
Congressman Jack Kingston (R/GA-1) will appear on FOX News’ Your World with Neil Cavuto TODAY at 4:00 p.m. (eastern) to discuss the resignation of Van Jones, President Obama’s Green Jobs Czar. In addition, Congressman Kingston will discuss his ongoing efforts to bring more transparency and accountability to President Obama’s specially-appointed czars. For more information, check your local listings or click here.
Earlier this year, Congressman Kingston introduced legislation which would withhold any funding from President Obama’s czars unless they are confirmed by the United States Senate. [another answer to prayer folks!!] With Mr. Jones the second czar to resign amid scandal, shouldn’t those given unprecedented power undergo the same scrutiny as more than 1,000 presidential appointees granted much less power?
For more information on the issue, floor statements by Congressman Kingston, and clips of previous media appearances, please visit http://kingston.house.gov/czar.
And My Thoughts Exactly ?? .... Georgia Rules and Obama Drools!! ha ha
More Happy News ~ Judson Hill (R-GA)
God is being so merciful, beyond measure.
Judson Hill (R-GA) has proposed an amendment here that would keep the federal health plan OUT OF GEORGIA!! No fascist Obamacare for us, thank you very much! Wahoo!! Praise God for answered prayer. Y'all keep praying for this resolution to pass please.
And, if you would, please call (404.656.0150) and/or write (judson.hill@senate.ga.gov) Mr. Hill and tell him Thank You. He needs to know that we support him with this amendment. I am going to do so when his office opens tomorrow. I have been praying for this since I learned it is legal for a State to do so under the 10th Amendment in the US Constitution.
Have a happy day folks! I know I will. :)
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Some Good News And Thoughts ~ Van Jones Is History
First, the happy news, it appears that the racist Marxist Green Jobs Czar Van Jones is history. One down ... about 35 (+-) and one illegal Kenyan to go. It would be wonderful to break the back of the Marxist shadow government created by Obamanation.
And it would be best if our
"He who sows wickedness reaps trouble, and the rod of his fury will be destroyed." Psalms 22:8
I have a feeling this is just the beginning of our leader's woes. Our government's and mainstream media's continual desire to crush those of us who believe in freedom will bring only trouble to them. BUT, I pray that all the strife they will have heaped upon themselves brings them to eternal salvation before it's too late. Many times we must hit rock bottom before we look up and see Christ. I earnestly pray they all repent soon.
And our oppressor wannabe's need also remember that sharing the news about what's happening in our government IS NOT HATE SPEECH. Nor is it "bearing false witness" for a Christian to speak out about the Obamanation in our government. We must jump into the political arena and speak out against evil or people truly will suffer. When good does nothing, evil rules the day. Just look at Nazi Germany, and the Russians under Stalin. Cruelty and oppression can happen anywhere, even in America.
All people are suppose to "seek the truth" in all things. It helps keep us straight with God and know His will. To be oppressive is not a good course to take, whether it's religion, government, in family's, etc. Oppression kills our spirit.
I was accused of hate speech and bearing false witness against the Obamanation yesterday by a Christian now former supposed friend on Facebook. I'm glad I learned of his progressive leanings and mental illness early (for the letter I received from him reveals much about his moth-eaten soul). He was a weak link in the chain proclaiming freedom for all and needed to be culled from the herd. So, even though I am good at eviscerating, I released him into the wild with a prayer for his soul.
Differences of opinion don't concern me, but meanness does.
"Cast out the scoffer, and contention will leave; Yes strife and reproach will cease." Psalms 22:10
That works! :)
Have a happy folks. Thanks for listening.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Obama, the Mortal By Charles Krauthammer
Now this article is very good. I really like Mr. Krauthammer's take on the situation. He's always so calm and rational. The only thing is I hope it's not true that some version of 'healthcare' will pass. This whole 'healthcare' thing from the Obama Administration is so bogus, all the government wants is to control all of the economy and steal our freedoms. The politicians don't care about reforming health care 'cause if they did, they would elimiate Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc. So, I'm not buying their phony concern.
Obama, the Mortal By Charles Krauthammer
Source
What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down farther than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post–Nixon pardon)?
The conventional wisdom is that Obama made a tactical mistake by farming out his agenda to Congress and allowing himself to be pulled left by the doctrinaire liberals of the Democratic congressional leadership. But the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous. Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chavista ex-terrorist William Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter Jeremiah Wright?
But forget the character witnesses. Just look at Obama’s behavior as president, beginning with his first address to Congress. Unbidden, unforced, and unpushed by the congressional leadership, Obama gave his most deeply felt vision of America, delivering the boldest social-democratic manifesto ever issued by a U.S. president. In American politics, you can’t get more left than that speech and still be on the playing field.
In a center-Right country, that was problem enough. Obama then compounded it by vastly misreading his mandate. He assumed it was personal. This, after winning by a mere seven points in a year of true economic catastrophe, of an extraordinarily unpopular Republican incumbent, and of a politically weak and unsteady opponent. Nonetheless, Obama imagined that, as Fouad Ajami so brilliantly observed, he had won the kind of banana-republic plebiscite that grants caudillo-like authority to remake everything in one’s own image.
Accordingly, Obama unveiled his plans for a grand makeover of the American system, animating that vision by enacting measure after measure that greatly enlarged state power, government spending, and national debt. Not surprisingly, these measures engendered powerful popular skepticism that burst into tea-party town-hall resistance.
Obama’s reaction to that resistance made things worse. Obama fancies himself tribune of the people, spokesman for the grass roots, harbinger of a new kind of politics from below that would upset the established lobbyist special-interest order of Washington. Yet faced with protests from a real grassroots movement, his party and his supporters called it a mob — misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged, bordering on racist. All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest — from drug companies to auto unions to doctors — in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.
“Get out of the way” and “don’t do a lot of talking,” the great bipartisan scolded opponents whom he blamed for creating the “mess” from which he is merely trying to save us. If only they could see. So with boundless confidence in his own persuasiveness, Obama undertook a summer campaign to enlighten the masses by addressing substantive objections to his reforms.
Things got worse still. With answers so slippery and implausible and, well, fishy, he began jeopardizing the most fundamental asset of any new president — trust. You can’t say that the system is totally broken and in need of radical reconstruction, but nothing will change for you; that Medicare is bankrupting the country, but $500 billion in cuts will have no effect on care; that you will expand coverage while reducing deficits — and not inspire incredulity and mistrust. When ordinary citizens understand they are being played for fools, they bristle.
After a disastrous summer — mistaking his mandate, believing his press, centralizing power, governing left, disdaining citizens for (of all things) organizing — Obama is in trouble.
Let’s be clear: This is a fall, not a collapse. He’s not been repudiated or even defeated. He will likely regroup and pass some version of health-insurance reform that will restore some of his clout and popularity.
But what has occurred — irreversibly — is this: He’s become ordinary. The spell is broken. The charismatic conjurer of 2008 has shed his magic. He’s regressed to the mean, tellingly expressed in poll numbers hovering at 50 percent.
For a man who only recently bred a cult, ordinariness is a great burden, and for his acolytes, a crushing disappointment. Obama has become a politician like others. And like other flailing presidents, he will try to salvage a cherished reform — and his own standing — with yet another prime-time speech.
But for the first time since election night in Grant Park, he will appear in the most unfamiliar of guises — mere mortal, a treacherous transformation to which a man of Obama’s supreme self-regard may never adapt.
— Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2009, The Washington Post Writers Group
Obama, the Mortal By Charles Krauthammer
Source
What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down farther than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post–Nixon pardon)?
The conventional wisdom is that Obama made a tactical mistake by farming out his agenda to Congress and allowing himself to be pulled left by the doctrinaire liberals of the Democratic congressional leadership. But the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous. Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chavista ex-terrorist William Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter Jeremiah Wright?
But forget the character witnesses. Just look at Obama’s behavior as president, beginning with his first address to Congress. Unbidden, unforced, and unpushed by the congressional leadership, Obama gave his most deeply felt vision of America, delivering the boldest social-democratic manifesto ever issued by a U.S. president. In American politics, you can’t get more left than that speech and still be on the playing field.
In a center-Right country, that was problem enough. Obama then compounded it by vastly misreading his mandate. He assumed it was personal. This, after winning by a mere seven points in a year of true economic catastrophe, of an extraordinarily unpopular Republican incumbent, and of a politically weak and unsteady opponent. Nonetheless, Obama imagined that, as Fouad Ajami so brilliantly observed, he had won the kind of banana-republic plebiscite that grants caudillo-like authority to remake everything in one’s own image.
Accordingly, Obama unveiled his plans for a grand makeover of the American system, animating that vision by enacting measure after measure that greatly enlarged state power, government spending, and national debt. Not surprisingly, these measures engendered powerful popular skepticism that burst into tea-party town-hall resistance.
Obama’s reaction to that resistance made things worse. Obama fancies himself tribune of the people, spokesman for the grass roots, harbinger of a new kind of politics from below that would upset the established lobbyist special-interest order of Washington. Yet faced with protests from a real grassroots movement, his party and his supporters called it a mob — misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged, bordering on racist. All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest — from drug companies to auto unions to doctors — in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.
“Get out of the way” and “don’t do a lot of talking,” the great bipartisan scolded opponents whom he blamed for creating the “mess” from which he is merely trying to save us. If only they could see. So with boundless confidence in his own persuasiveness, Obama undertook a summer campaign to enlighten the masses by addressing substantive objections to his reforms.
Things got worse still. With answers so slippery and implausible and, well, fishy, he began jeopardizing the most fundamental asset of any new president — trust. You can’t say that the system is totally broken and in need of radical reconstruction, but nothing will change for you; that Medicare is bankrupting the country, but $500 billion in cuts will have no effect on care; that you will expand coverage while reducing deficits — and not inspire incredulity and mistrust. When ordinary citizens understand they are being played for fools, they bristle.
After a disastrous summer — mistaking his mandate, believing his press, centralizing power, governing left, disdaining citizens for (of all things) organizing — Obama is in trouble.
Let’s be clear: This is a fall, not a collapse. He’s not been repudiated or even defeated. He will likely regroup and pass some version of health-insurance reform that will restore some of his clout and popularity.
But what has occurred — irreversibly — is this: He’s become ordinary. The spell is broken. The charismatic conjurer of 2008 has shed his magic. He’s regressed to the mean, tellingly expressed in poll numbers hovering at 50 percent.
For a man who only recently bred a cult, ordinariness is a great burden, and for his acolytes, a crushing disappointment. Obama has become a politician like others. And like other flailing presidents, he will try to salvage a cherished reform — and his own standing — with yet another prime-time speech.
But for the first time since election night in Grant Park, he will appear in the most unfamiliar of guises — mere mortal, a treacherous transformation to which a man of Obama’s supreme self-regard may never adapt.
— Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2009, The Washington Post Writers Group
Box Car Prisons For American Dissidents
Dang, now there's something else to worry about! And this has been around since 1999 ... let's see that was under President Bill Clinton, right? [sigh] Yeah, and President George W. Bush too. I also learned that Pres. Bush passed a bill that now requires all baby's born in the USA to give DNA samples while they're still in the hospital. This is FORCED on the baby! That is awful. The more I learn about him, the more I realize what a horrible president he was.
Anyway, here's more to worry about: Box Car Prisons For Those Who Oppose Obama Communism
Do you really think they'd ever get me in one of those things conscious? Noooooo.
Anyway, here's more to worry about: Box Car Prisons For Those Who Oppose Obama Communism
Do you really think they'd ever get me in one of those things conscious? Noooooo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)