Saturday, June 13, 2009

The Corruption Continues In The Obama Administration

What's behind Obama's sudden attempt to fire the AmeriCorps inspector general?
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
06/11/2009 8:14 PM EDT
New info: See updates below for Walpin's "one-hour deadline" e-mail to the White House.

There are a number of unanswered questions today about President Obama's abrupt decision to fire the inspector general of the AmeriCorps program, Gerald Walpin. Obama sent letters to House and Senate leaders yesterday informing them that he was firing Walpin, effective 30 days from the date of the letters.

"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General," the president wrote. "That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General."

The 30 day requirement is important because last year Congress passed the Inspectors General Reform Act, which was designed to strengthen protections for IGs, who have the responsibility of investigating allegations of waste, fraud and abuse within federal agencies, against interference by political appointees or the White House. Part of the Act was a requirement that the president give Congress 30 days' notice before dismissing an IG. One of the co-sponsors of the Act was then-Sen. Barack Hussein Obama.

The Act also requires the president to outline the cause for his decision to remove an IG. Beyond saying that he did not have the "fullest confidence" in Walpin, Obama gave no reason for his action.

There are two big questions about the president's actions. One, why did he decide to fire Walpin? And two, did he abide by the law that he himself co-sponsored?

According to Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, a strong advocate of inspectors general, Walpin received a call from the White House Counsel's office on Wednesday evening. Walpin was told that he had one hour to either resign or be fired. Senate sources say Walpin asked why he was being fired and, according to one source, "The answer that was given was that it's just time to move on. The president would like to have someone else in that position." Walpin declined to resign.

Grassley fired off a letter to the president on Thursday saying that, "I was troubled to learn that [Wednesday] night your staff reportedly issued an ultimatum to the AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin that he had one hour to resign or be terminated," Grassley wrote. "As you know, Inspectors General were created by Congress as a means to combat waste, fraud, and abuse and to be independent watchdogs ensuring that federal agencies were held accountable for their actions. Inspectors General were designed to have a dual role reporting to both the President and Congress so that they would be free from undue political pressure. This independence is the hallmark of all Inspectors General and is essential so they may operate independently, without political pressure or interference from agencies attempting to keep their failings from public scrutiny."

Grassley's version of events suggests that the White House first tried to muscle Walpin out of his job without having to go through the 30-day process. It was only when Walpin refused to resign that the White House then notified Congress of the president's intention to fire Walpin.

The bigger question is why the president is doing this and why he is attempting to do it so quickly. Senate sources now believe Obama is firing Walpin over Walpin's investigation of Kevin Johnson, a former NBA star and a prominent supporter of the president.

Johnson, now the mayor of Sacramento, California, started a non-profit organization called St. Hope. The group's mission, according to its website, is "to revitalize inner-city communities through public education, civic leadership, economic development and the arts." As part of its work, St. Hope received a grant of about $850,000 from AmeriCorps.

Last year, Walpin began an investigation of how Johnson's group spent the money. According to the Associated Press, "[Walpin] found that Johnson, a former all-star point guard for the Phoenix Suns, had used AmeriCorps grants to pay volunteers to engage in school-board political activities, run personal errands for Johnson and even wash his car." Walpin asked federal prosecutors to investigate. In April, the U.S. attorney in Sacramento, a Bush holdover, declined to file any criminal charges in the matter and also criticized Walpin's investigation.

That might suggest that St. HOPE was OK, and it was Walpin who was in the wrong. But at the same time prosecutors decided not to file any charges against St. HOPE, the U.S. attorney's office also entered into a settlement with St. HOPE in which the group also agreed to pay back about half of the $850,000 it had received from AmeriCorps.

In his letter to the president, Grassley defended Walpin's performance. "There have been no negative findings against Mr. Walpin by the Integrity Committee of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), and he has identified millions of dollars in AmeriCorps funds either wasted outright or spent in violation of established guidelines," Grassley wrote. "In other words, it appears he has been doing his job. "

The bottom line is that the AmeriCorps IG accused a prominent Obama supporter of misusing AmeriCorps grant money. After an investigation, the prominent Obama supporter had to pay back more than $400,000 of that grant money. And Obama fired the AmeriCorps IG.

Source

----

There's more at the link above, including comments from other readers.

I say we fire the illegal self-professing 'progressive*' Mr. Obama now before the rest of the country goes down the tubes. Mr. Obama is CORRUPT and evil! So much for 'change'.

You what the difference is between God and Obama?

God knows He's not Obama.

     * The term Progressive has replaced Liberal.
        The Democrats-Republicans are using it now
        to hide more of their corrupt politics.

6 comments:

  1. I understand by listening to Michael Savage that Obama is putting an old friend of Michelles in as Inspector General.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe it takes a confident person to keep people in his employ who aren't strong supporters. Obviously, he's not confident.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Melody ~ Yeah, he's breaking the law so he may continue to break the law. [sigh] The corruption continues ...

    Iva ~ The trouble is BHO is over confident! He's a narcissic ego maniac. I expect the concentration camps for those who oppose him to start any day now.

    Thanks y'all for stopping by. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Sparky. Thanks for keeping tabs on our "Rockstar-In-Chief". I've become so jaded over the whole mess that I've shut down. I say, "Scr3w it..Let's Ride" 2010 is right around the corner and I'll comment on the situation WITH MY VOTE. Until then, I'll just count my blessings and work on enjoying them. God Bless

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shenanigans as usual. The deception and corruption tour continues. Also, I went to Rachel's website. Very moving and inspiring. I like when she says cancer does not define her. I enjoy reading these portraits of courage. Thanks for the link.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wingmaster ~ You're welcome. Gosh, though, I sure wish BHO, et. el. would stop being so dangerous. I'd like to talk about something / someone else for awhile, you know? :o)

    Carey ~ Quite right about the shenanigans. And so glad you could view Rachel's testimony. It is powerful.

    God bless y'all! Thanks heaps for stopping by.

    ReplyDelete

⭐ A real friend is one who walks in when the rest of the world walks out. ~ Walter Winchell