Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Our 30th Wedding Anniversary


In 1979, Steve and I stood before a Notary Public and said our "I do's". 30 years later, we're still together, more in love than ever.

I thought y'all might enjoy some of our old wedding photos.

We shared our "I Do's"


Our First Dance As Husband And Wife


[tee hee] [giggle] [lol]


This is my favorite wedding photo.
Can you tell I'm saying "mine, mine, mine". [lol]

So, we're out and about today, swinging through the jungle, celebrating our happy union. I'll let you know tomorrow what we did ... less the censored stuff, of course ... tee hee.

I hope your day is just as much fun! Awww, eeee, awwww!



Monday, August 10, 2009

The Lesser-Magistrate Doctrine

I received this in an e-mail from my husband last night. Isn't that funny? We sit right next to each other with our seperate labtops and he sends me an e-mail! How modern is that!? [lol]

This is a good read folks. Very, very encouraging. I feel like, if we keep spreading the good word and having Hope there will be a happy resolution. We will not tolerate any fascism that Mr. Obuma and his thugs keep trying to force on the American people.


The Lesser-Magistrate Doctrine:
A Sword Against Unjust Edicts and Tyranny
By Pastor Matt Trewhella
The Covenant News ~ April 07, 2009


Many Americans seem to know that America's founders gave us three boxes through which we can resist tyranny, namely - the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box. But a lesser-known tool which the founders themselves employed is the lesser-magistrate doctrine.

Simply put, the lesser-magistrate doctrine declares that - when a magistrate, who is lower in authority than another higher authority, opposes and/or resists the unjust orders or laws of the higher authority, he is justified in doing so and his actions are morally right, proper, and legitimate.

For example, if Congress or the President makes an unjust or immoral edict, a state legislature or the governor could stand in defiance of their unjust edict and refuse to obey or implement it. They could in fact actively oppose it. Or for that matter, a city council or mayor could act in defiance or opposition of an unjust edict by a higher authority.

The lesser-magistrate doctrine became important to Christian men during the Reformation, though it had been spoken of and practiced prior to that by Christians. For example, the Magna Carta was written by a group of barons (lesser-magistrates) who had the tyrant King John of England sign it in the year 1215 at Runneymede, which is located southwest of London.

This great document which stands in defiance of tyranny and oppression by making clear that the State has limitations and that all are subject to the law – people and state officials alike - was penned by Christian men.

Calvin spoke of the lesser-magistrate doctrine in his Institutes of the Christian Religion. Amazingly, he did not appeal to Scripture in his support of it, rather he appealed to pagan historical examples. But other Reformers did give a Scriptural foundation to the doctrine.

John Knox for example, in his Appellation written to the nobles of Scotland in 1558, cites many passages to support the doctrine. Knox wrote his appellation (appeal) to the nobles because the Roman church had condemned him and burned him in effigy. He wrote to declare to the nobles, as lesser-magistrates, their responsibility in protecting the innocent and opposing those who had made unjust decrees.

Knox makes it clear that it is the duty of lesser-magistrates to resist the tyranny of chief magistrates when the chief magistrate exceeds his God-given authority or actually makes declarations which are in rebellion to the law of God.

He exhorts the nobles (lesser-magistrates) in his Appellation, "You are bound to correct and repress whatsoever you know him (the higher magistrate) to attempt expressly repugning to God's word, honor, glory, or what you shall espy him to do against his subjects great or small."

Some of the Scripture texts Knox cites to expound on the lesser-magistrate doctrine are Daniel 3; I Kings 12; II Kings 11; and Jeremiah 26:10-16; 36:9-31; 37:11- 21 & 39:7-10.

The lesser-magistrate doctrine had a huge impact upon the thinking of our founders, and upon our nation's people regarding government and law. We however live in the midst of a statist, slave-like people where such thinking has long been forgotten. The magistrates themselves know nothing of this doctrine today because the pulpits have long been silent regarding it.

If ever this nation needs to understand the lesser-magistrate doctrine, it is now. Immoral and unjust edicts are commonplace. The preborn are being murdered, and sodomy is being proliferated. The assault upon our freedom and liberties is a daily undertaking by those in high office. The attacks upon the law of God are ferocious and relentless.

In our nation today, the State has declared good to be evil and evil to be good. The lesser-magistrate has a duty before God to uphold the good regardless of the new definitions created by the State.

We must remember that all authority is delegated. No man who holds State office rules autonomously. The authority he has is delegated to him by God. Hence, all those in positions of authority stand accountable to God. This is why the practice of the church historically has been – when the State commands that which God forbids or forbids that which God commands, we have a duty to obey God rather than man. The Bible clearly teaches this principle.

The lesser-magistrate is to apply this principle to his office as magistrate. When an unjust edict is made by a higher authority, the lesser-magistrate must choose to either join the higher magistrate in his rebellion against God, or stand with God in opposition to the unjust edict.

As our nation sinks more and more into rebellion and depravity, the lesser-magistrate doctrine needs to be taught more than ever. May the Lord grant us the strength and favor to do so.

Source

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Sheriff Mack On "Treasure's Lost"


I received the video below from a blogging buddy today and thought y'all might wanna hear this also.

Sheriff Mack is the former sheriff of Graham County, Arizona. To quote him from his web site "Right now, it is vital that we restore the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. The greatest threat we face today is not terrorists; it is our own federal government. If America is conquered or ruined it will be from within, not a foreign enemy."

He certainly is a man with courage in my book. I have been so concerned about what's going to happen if/when ACORN or the EPA show up on our property, armed and dangerous. Under the Cap and Trade and other bills, this will be legal! ACORN will also be used to take the Federal Census! ACORN!! The Left hand of the Democratic party. I'm not makin' this stuff up folks. Hubby and I have discussed the possibility of these events at the supper table and decided we are going to fight to defend our homes and lives. We not lawbreakers, never have been, but this is a hill we will die on.

May God richly bless any and all Sheriff's and their officers who will also fight to protect our rights in the coming days ahead. Please feel free to share this with anyone who might be interested. I've burned some to DVD's and will share with our police department.



Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Kingston Town Hall Meeting

This afternoon we attended our very first, and probably not our last, Town Hall Meeting in southeast Georgia. We were going to attend the one in Brunswick, but it turns out there was one in Waycross (infinitely closer for us). I would say there was about 200 warm bodies in the room, give or take.

Oh, and have you heard? This administration is labeling those of us who dare to disagree with the Progressive movement or the Magic Negro an "angry well organized GOP mob".

Huh?!?

I don't know about y'all but I'm just as angry at the GOP as I am at the Dem's ... maybe even more so. I feel betrayed by the Republicans. That's why we are now Libertarians.


Angry Mob Photo

Don't we look threatening?

Ok, some talking points about how the, eh, mob reacted to Rep. Kingston speech:

A) Everyone we met and heard was polite and reserved. When Jack Kingston spoke we listened quietly.

B) None of us had pre-printed T-shirts with our agenda proudly displayed, like, oh let's say ACORN.

C) We did not have professional preprinted signs.

D) No one had a megaphone.

E) Nor did we yell perfectly orchestrated chants.

Geez, these angry mobs are sneaky, ain't they?


Rep. Jack Kingston explaining
sections of ObamaCare

There were only two commie lib's that dared to get up and ask their usual stupid questions. One was a school Principal and the first thing out of her mouth was [whining voice] "But what about insurance for the children?" I let out such a loud sigh and comment that all the people around me started laughing. My comment? "Whatever happened to the parents taking care of their own kids lady?!" I actually got some quiet applause.

The lady sat down. [cricket] [cricket]

An older gentleman stood up, very respectfully, at the microphone provided and told Rep. Kingston that we are angry at this Administration and throwing out words now. He stated how ashamed he was that we are even talking about all these freedom stealing legislation's. He also said that if any of these heinous bills pass into law, the government is going to have a full-scale revolution on their hands.

The whole auditorium erupted in applause!! I felt so warmly towards these wonderful neighbors of mine.


So, News Flash, we're not laughing Mr. Obama.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Town Hall Meeting In SE Georgia


Rep. Jack Kingston, R-GA
Official Biography

Our Rep. Jack Kingston is planning to meet with any constituents that wish to discuss current bills before Congress. The meeting is Wednesday (August 5th) from 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM in Brunswick at the College of Coastal Georgia Conference Center.

Please follow the link for more information. I hope many can attend and help voice our concerns over the encroaching communism in our country.

Rep. Kingston has consistently voted against all this socialism, even when President George W. Bush pushed through many unconstitutional bills. We need to show Rep. Kingston our support.

NO to ObamaCare

NO to Cap and Trade

NO to more Cash For Clunkers

Hope to see y'all there! God bless.

Monday, August 3, 2009

It's Time To Abolish Homeland Security


I think this story is self-explanatory. 'Course, this did happen in Lousy-anna (Home of ACORN). They lost their souls a long time ago.


HOMELAND INSECURITY
Suspect detained over 'extremist' bumper sticker
'Don't Tread on Me' puts driver in 'watch' category in DHS report

Posted: May 07, 2009
10:45 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A Louisiana driver was stopped and detained for having a "Don't Tread on Me" bumper sticker on his vehicle and warned by a police officer about the "subversive" message it sent, according to the driver's relative.

The situation developed in the small town of Ball, Louisiana, where a receptionist at the police department told WND she knew nothing about the traffic stop, during which the "suspect" was investigated for "extremist" activities, the relative said.

A man identifying himself as a police officer from Ball called WND later to report that the town's records of traffic stops did not include this situation. He suggested it might have involved one of several other agencies that work in the area.

It followed by only a few weeks the release of a Department of Homeland Security report, "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment", which prompted outrage from legislators and a campaign calling for the resignation of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano.

The report, which cites individuals who sport certain bumper stickers on their vehicles as suspect, was delivered to tens of thousands of local law enforcement officers across the nation.

WND is withholding the driver's name and the relative's name at their request.

However, the situation was described on the American Vision blog.

According to the relative, it happened this way: Her brother-in-law was driving home from work through the town, which has a local reputation for enhancing its budget by ticketing speeders. He was pulled over by police officers who told him "he had a subversive survivalist bumper sticker on his car."

Are you ready for a second Declaration of Independence? Sign the petition promoting true freedom once again!

"They proceeded to keep him there on the side of the road while they ran whatever they do to see if you have a record, keeping him standing by the side of the road for 30 minutes," she told WND.

Finding no record and no reason to keep him, they warned him and eventually let him go, she said.

The company that sells the bumper sticker is The Patriot Depot, where Chief Operating Officer Jay Taylor told WND the woman had told his staff about the situation while ordering more bumper stickers.

"It's rather shocking," he said. "We supposedly have freedom of speech in our country.

Proclaim to everyone: "Don't tread on me!" Get your own Gadsden Flag here!

"We joke around every now and then how our spouses will come to visit us in jail," he continued, citing his products that say, "The Audacity of Nope," "Taxed Enough Already," "Born Free, Taxed to Death," "Bring Home Our Troops: Send the Democrats" and "I'll Keep my Guns and Money, You Keep the 'Change'."

"We hope people realize this is serious," he said.

American Vision noted the "background check" that was done on the driver.

"Why? [He] had purchased and displayed a conservative 'Don't Tread on Me' bumper sticker.""

The commentator wrote, "The bumper sticker is based on the famous flag designed by American Revolution era general and statesman Christopher Gadsden. The yellow flag featured a coiled diamondback rattlesnake ready to strike, with the slogan 'Don't Tread on Me!' underneath it. Benjamin Franklin helped make the rattlesnake a symbol of Americans' reluctance to quarrel but vigilance and resolve in defense of their rights. By 1775 when Gadsden presented his flag to the commander-in-chief of the Navy, the rattlesnake was a symbol of the colonies and of their need to unite in defense of threats to their God-given and inherited rights. The flag and the bumper sticker symbolize American patriotism, the need to defend Americans' rights, and resistance to tyranny's threats to American liberty. Those threats included-and include-illegal taxation, profanation of Americans' rights, and violation of the fundamental principles of American law."

American Vision continued: "The notorious Department of Homeland Security memo, which was apparently based on the infamous Missouri State Police Report that described supporters of presidential candidates Bob Barr, Ron Paul, and Chuck Baldwin as 'militia'-type potential extremists and potential terrorists, is not the first effort of leftist radicals to slander their political opponents as 'extremists.'"

"'Liberals' and other leftists have been calling defenders of traditional American limited, constitutional government, free enterprise, and individual liberty 'extremists' since at least the 1964 election," the Vision America statement said. "Small town police misled by phony left wing 'reports' are bad enough. Federal government agencies and their armed agents under the direction of leftist radicals are exponentially worse."

WND reported earlier on the DHS report, which advised about the "extremism" that could be expected from returning veterans, those who support homeschooling and oppose abortion, post certain bumper stickers on their vehicles and other factors.

The DHS not only issued that report, but also an earlier memo defining dozens of groups, members of animal rights organizations, black separatists, tax protesters and others as "threats."

That item, the "Domestic Extremism Lexicon" reportedly was rescinded almost immediately, but Benjamin Sarlin of The Daily Beast recently obtained and published online a copy of the unclassified memo, dated March 26, 2009.

It defines the "tax resistance movement" – also referred to in the report as the tax protest movement or the tax freedom movement – as "groups or individuals who vehemently believe taxes violate their constitutional rights. Among their beliefs are that wages are not income, that paying income taxes is voluntary, and that the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which allowed Congress to levy taxes on income, was not properly ratified."

It states that tax protesters "have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals."

Apparently, the DHS analyzes the "threat" level of Internet news websites like WorldNetDaily, for the lexicon defines "alternative media" as "a term used to describe various information sources that provide a forum for interpretations of events and issues that differ radically from those presented in mass media products and outlets."

WorldNetDaily Exclusive