Friday, September 4, 2009
Obama's First Six Months' Accomplishments
Obama's First Six Months' Accomplishments
1. Offended the Queen of England.
2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.
3. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega.
4. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek.
5. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia.
6. Sided with Hugo Chavez and Communist Fidel Castro against Honduras.
7. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions while they're building their nuclear weapons.
8. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions.
9. Expanded the bailouts.
10. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian.
11. Doubled our national debt.
12. Announced the termination of our new missile defense system the day after North Korea launched an ICBM.
13. Released information on U.S. intelligence gathering despite urgings of his own CIA director and the prior four CIA directors not to do so.
14. Accepted without comment that five of his cabinet members cheated on their taxes and two other nominees withdrew after they couldn't take the heat.
15. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who identified military veterans and abortion opponents as "dangers to the nation."
16. Ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used and instead refers to such acts as "manmade disasters."
17. Circled the globe to publicly apologize for America's world leadership.
18. Told the Mexican president that the violence in their country was because of us.
19. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from the Department of Commerce.
20. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the forced removal and expulsion to Cuba of a 9-year-old whose mother died trying to bring him to freedom in the United States.
21. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three terrorists who threatened one American life and the next day announces members of the Bush administration may stand trial for "torturing" three 9/11 terrorists by pouring water up their noses.
22. Low altitude photo shoot of Air Force One over New York City that frightened thousands of New Yorkers.
23. Sent his National Defense Adviser to Europe to assure them that the US will no longer treat Israel in a special manner and they might be on their own with the Muslims.
24. Praised Jimmy Carter's trip to Gaza where he sided with terrorist Hamas against Israel .
25. Nationalized General Motors and Chrysler while turning shareholder control over to the unions and freezing out retired investors who owned their bonds. Committed unlimited taxpayer billions in the process.
26. Passed a huge energy tax in the House that will make American industry even less competitive while costing homeowners thousands per year.
27. Announced nationalized health care "reform" that will strip seniors of their Medicare, cut pay of physicians, increase taxes yet another $1 trillion, and put everyone on rationed care with government bureaucrats deciding who gets care and who doesn't. If this bill passes, it's guarenteed to kill millions of Americans. Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them," while former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die."
28. Created a shadow government with all his unappointed, non-elected "Czars" and refuses to admit that.
29. Has threatened all freedom loving persons through intimidation and fear tactics with his "fishy" compaign.
If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that the President, Senators and Congressmen have their own special gold plated health care plan which is guaranteed the remainder of their lives and they are not subject to this new law if they pass it.
Please use the power of the Internet to get this message out. Talk it up at the grassroots level. We have an election coming up in one year and four months where we can reverse the dangerous direction of the Obama administration and its allies. In the interim, we can make their lives miserable. Lets do it!
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Another Attempt To Destroy Our Freedom Of Speech
Gosh, I'm tired of this evil government!! I wish they would get a life and quit trying to screw with mine (and yours).
Here's something else y'all need to be concerned about. They want to squish our freedom of speech and spew it out their backsides.
Y'all had better be concerned and keep writing (as Marydon sez put a stamp on it, e-mails are being ignored in some quarters), calling, PRAYING and anything else one can think of to fight this tyrannical government.
Left Coast Rebel posted this on his blog recently. He got it from the Memorandum site, and I quote:
Obama White House Has Secret Plan To Harvest Personal Data From Social Networking Websites
NLPC has uncovered a plan by the White House New Media operation to hire a technology vendor to conduct a massive, secret effort to harvest personal information on millions of Americans from social networking websites.
The information to be captured includes comments, tag lines, emails, audio, and video. The targeted sites include Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr and others – any space where the White House “maintains a presence.”
In the course of investigating procurement by the White House New Media office, NLPC discovered a 51-page solicitation of bids that was filed on Friday, August 21, 2009. Filed as Solicitation # WHO-S-09-0003, it is posted at FedBizzOps.com. Click here to download a 51-page pdf of the solicitation.
While the solicitation specifies a 12-month contract, it allows for seven one-year extensions. It specifies no dollar cap. Other troubling issues include:
extremely broad secrecy terms preventing the vendor from disclosing to the public or the media what information is being captured and archived (page 7, “Restriction Against Disclosure”)
----- wholesale capturing of comments by non-White House staff on publicly accessible sites
------ capturing of content of any type (text, graphics, audio, or video)
------ capturing of comments by both Obama critics and supporters, with no restriction as to how the White House would use the information.
This is the third controversy involving the White House internet operations in less than a month. First, Obama’s New Media operation asked supporters to send information about critics of the White House health care effort to a White House email. This provoked a storm of criticism and the White House retreated. Then large number of people complained of getting email spam from the White House supporting the President’s health care position. Again the White House was forced to back down.
Now the same people at the White House are at it again with an ambitious plan to harvest huge amounts of information from the web and specifically social networking sites.
Given the White House’s recent abuse of its New Media operations, this huge, new secretive program is yet another sign that this Administration is at best indifferent to privacy rights and at worst prepared to violate civil liberties for political purposes.
Perhaps anticipating negative reaction to the invasiveness of the plan, a justification is provided in a Q&A. section of the solicitation. Question #9 reads:
The Presidential Records Act does not require the storage or archiving of non-EOP content, as such is there a specific reason as to why the content provided on EOP related websites in the form of comments is included in these archiving procedures?
Answer: The PRA includes in its definition of presidential records content ―received by PRA components and personnel. Out of an abundance of caution, we are treating comments made by non-PRA personnel on sites on which a PRA component has a presence as presidential records, requiring them to be captured or sampled.
Of course, this interpretation of the Presidential Records Act is so expansive that virtually any communication mentioning the president or the Administration could become subject to collection and archiving under the Act. This is not out of an “abundance of caution,” but out of an over-abundance of power. President Obama should make sure that this plan goes no further.
See also CNN 'Expert' Lamely Claims to 'Debunk' NLPC on White House Data Harvesting From Social Networks.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Southern National Congress
Even as an avowed Libertarian (have been for about 8 years now - had a kind of Spiritual awakening, if you will) I'm really not much of a political person and have only recently heard of the Southern National Congress.
What or who are they?
Apparently, they are a group of men and women who will help the South maintain and exercise our sovereignty, if I have the wording correctly. I find this very encouraging. If the Marxists keep pushing our buttons, there's going to be conflict and the ARMED FORCES WILL BE ON OUR SIDE!
Well, alrighty then.
I received the 50 pocket US Constitutions I ordered from The Heritage. My husband and I are slowly passing them on to neighbors, law enforcement, church family, etc. People are very receptive to "the good news" as I call it. We must have a Godly law to live by (we have that in the Constitution) or there will be chaos and the bad guys will win.
We must not let that happen. There must be order and method.
I received what's below from another true Patriot and this has further encouraged me to feel that we are not alone in wanting to obey the US Constitution. So, I thought my fellow Southerners would find this edifying as well.
Be sure to leave me your comments and thoughts on this. Praise God for my fellow Patriots!! Together, with God's help, we can hold the fabric of this country together.
Enjoy and spread the good word! Print out whats below and take it to your local law enforcement people. We need them to be alert and appreciate them very much.
Resolution and Appeal (Review Draft)
To the Sheriffs, Police Agencies, Adjutants General, Officers and Non-Commissioned Officers of the National Guard and State Militias of the Fourteen Southern States
We the Delegates of the Southern States, in Congress assembled, find and affirm the following:
The Southern people have traditionally been strong supporters of the rule of law, properly founded upon impartial justice. Instructed by our history, culture, and religion, we grasp the nature of human evil and understand that threats to the commonwealth exist. They must be restrained, sometimes by force. This is the principal role of civil government, from which it derives its legitimacy under God and in covenant with the People. However, the Southern tradition does not embrace order at the expense of liberty. When government becomes lawless and despotic, it forfeits its legitimacy, and thereby the allegiance and obedience of citizens.
Southerners respect our uniformed public servants and honour their high calling to be protectors, not punishers. They are to be agents of justice, not injustice. Their powers, including the proper use of physical force, up to and including the use of deadly force, exist only as delegated to them by the People and are for the protection of the community, not its oppression and enslavement. This responsibility may include protecting the People from government officials when they act in a lawless and despotic manner.
We acknowledge the dilemma peace officers face when given wrongful orders by a rogue government. But the state is not exempt from the rule of law. Police have been confronted with such fundamental moral choices before, and history does not exonerate those who follow tyranny rather than God’s law and their own good consciences. “Just following orders” has never excused anyone for committing unlawful, cruel, or oppressive acts against innocent citizens.
We believe today’s emphasis on “law enforcement” is destructive to our society and changes the mission of police toward enforcing the will of the government upon the people rather than protecting and serving the public. Police procedures requiring abject, immediate obedience and deference under the threat of unwarranted force is unnecessarily demeaning and threatens the well-being of good citizens who may only have been accused of a minor violation or misdemeanor.
We believe most peace officers are rightly patriotic and dedicated to the welfare of the citizens in their jurisdictions. However, in these troubled times, converging challenges to public order – economic, social, and political -- may test as never before their fidelity to their oaths to uphold their State constitutions, the U.S. Constitution, and just laws made in pursuance thereof.
We now suffer under a regime in Washington that treats Americans as if they were the enemy. Its open contempt of the rule of just law demonstrate that “national security” is a pretext for grasping unlimited power. Its increasingly unconstitutional and unlawful acts, including the militarization of local police, are ignored or abetted by the Congress and insufficiently restrained by the courts, which are supposed to safeguard our freedom.
Today law-making is no longer rooted in timeless Godly principles, but is the prize of the highest bidder, especially the moneyed interests whose vast sums have purchased a compliant Congress that scarcely bothers to read the bills brought before it. As government increasingly puts itself above the law, raw power and greed have become the coin of realm. The deterioration of law as an institution demands greater moral courage on the part of law enforcement officials. They must be more steadfast, not less, in keeping their oaths of office. More than ever, they must know and understand the Constitution they have sworn to defend.
We note with alarm the preparations by Federal authorities for massive unconstitutional acts in the event of a national emergency, which the Government itself may declare at will. Such acts may include unleashing the Armed Forces on the population in violation of posse comitatus and habeas corpus, and mass arrests of citizens for dissident speech, public assembly, or political associations, even though these are fully protected by the Bill of Rights of the Constitution.
Police and military officers who obey unlawful orders and take part in suppressing liberty no longer possess any legitimacy. In the event of civil strife, which their acquiescence to despotism will have partly caused, they must not expect obedience, much less the deference they now demand, from an oppressed, aroused, irate, yet armed citizenry.
***
Therefore, in light of the foregoing findings and affirmations, and in the name of the Southern People, we appeal to all law enforcement officials, the National Guard, and State militias to:
Remember whom you serve. Remember your oath. Remember that your moral authority comes from loyalty to the safety and well-being of the People and the commonwealth, not loyalty to the temporary occupants of political or judicial office.
Practice and demonstrate moral courage, especially in troubled times when it is needed most.
Defend the lives, property, and liberty of the citizens in your jurisdiction from all threats, even that of the lawless state, and treat them with as respect and dignity.
Interpose yourself when necessary between the People and open acts of tyranny by Federal or State officials.
Refuse any order to disarm citizens or in any way restrict their lawful means of self defence.
Refuse to conduct warrantless searches of citizens, or of their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects; for example, house-to house searches for weapons or persons.
Refuse to participate in mass arrests or to obey an order to detain citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal without due process of law.
Refuse to obey orders to impose martial law or a state of emergency on a State, or to enter with force into a State or County, without the express consent of the governor or sheriff, respectively.
Refuse orders to invade and subjugate any State that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that State entered the Union.
Refuse orders to force citizens into any form of Federal detention camp under any pretext.
Refuse to confiscate the property of citizens, including food and other essential supplies, during a natural disaster or under a declared national emergency or similar pretext.
Respect the right of the People to free speech and worship, to assemble peaceably, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
Recording Secretary ____ ________ _______ Chairman _______________________
Adopted September __, 2009 by the Second Southern National Congress at Delta, Alabama and ordered to be transmitted to the Governors, County Sheriffs, State Police, and Adjutants General of the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia; and to the President of the United States; and to the Congressional delegations of the Fourteen Southern States.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Questions We Want Obama To Answer NOW!
Just A Conservative Girl very graciously posted these at her web site recently. I am busier than a one-armed paperhanger today, so, I just cut and pasted the list for y'all in case you missed Glenn's show last Friday.
We are fighting for our very economic lives here folks. Gosh, I hope everyone is paying attention. I'm not doing this because I like politics (I don't) but want deseperately for our country to be saved from this evil presence in the White House.
And remember folks, the Federal census is coming in April. For goodness sake, don't complete it! I'm only filling out our names and ages ... THAT'S IT!! Not even race. I really think Obama and his Marxists minions are going to use that to start rounding people up for internment camps. God help you if you're white, Christian and/or Jew. You could get locked up like F.D. Roosevelt did to the American-Japanese in World War II. FDR was another tyrant who spit on the Constitution.
God bless you and thanks for listening.
---JACG's post---
Glen Beck has asked some questions:
I think most, if not all deserve answers. What do you think?
All this week we are asking questions; I may not have the answers, but power left unchecked can turn very ugly, very rapidly.
So it's vital that we all question with boldness, hold to the truth and speak without fear.
- Why do we need a civilian force?
- Who is posing a threat to us?
- Who will this "force" be made up of?
- Who is the real enemy?
- Does the president know of a coming event? If not, who builds an army against an unrecognized enemy?
- Why won't the media get off their butts and look into these radicals in the White House? And into this civilian army?
- Why does the FCC have a diversity "czar"?
- Who is Mark Lloyd and how does he plan to "balance" the airwaves?
- Will he bring back the Fairness Doctrine or worse?
- Cass Sunstein once said he wants to balance the Internet; is that next?
- Will broadcasters who leave the airwaves be allowed to go to satellite or Internet without government regulation?
- Is there any place (that has a mass audience) where the government wont regulate free speech?
- Why does it seem every member of the Obama advisory team hates capitalism, unless those companies (like G.E.) are in bed with the administration?
If Lloyd has his way, stations who don't comply to the governments definition of the "public interest" will have to pay a massive fine — that helps support public broadcasting:
- What will be the definition of "public interest"?
- Who defines "public interest"?
- Why should it be balanced? Because it's public airwaves? (Well, there are public roads that go by my house and I don't count how many Republicans and Democrats are driving on them)
Who is "surrounding" the President in the White House?
- Do any of the President's advisers have criminal records?
- Are the President's advisers working to better the country or their own ideals?
- Who are the anti-capitalists in Washington?
- What roles do they have in crafting bills?
- What was "STORM"?
What happened to the founders, where are they now?
- What qualifications must one have to be a Presidential adviser?
- What is the difference between a community organizer and a community activist?
- Do the czars have power?
- Should a communist have the ear of the President of the United States?
- What role did the Apollo Alliance play in crafting bills?
- Does the President know the co-founder of the Weather Underground is a board member of the Apollo Alliance?
- How many people in the administration are connected to the movement for a democratic society?
- What role does George Soros play... CONSTITUTIONALLY?
- Our unfunded liability for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is close to $100 trillion. Is there any way to pay for these programs without bankrupting America?
- We are in so much debt, why spend more borrowed money on cap-and-trade and healthcare programs before we stop the flow of red-ink?
- The stimulus package funneled billions of dollars to ACORN. How does giving billions of dollars to ACORN stimulate the economy?
- If it was so important for congress to pass the stimulus bill before they even had time to read it why has only a fraction of the stimulus money been spent 6 months later?
- Bush said he had to abandon free market principles in order to save them, how exactly does that work?
- Why won’t members of Congress read the bills before they vote on them?
- Why are citizens mocked and laughed at when they ask their congressman to read the bills before they vote on them?
- Was the cash-for-clunkers program meant to save the earth or the economy?
Did it accomplish either?
- How did Van Jones, a self-proclaimed communist become a special advisor to the president?
- Did President Obama know of Van Jones’ radical political beliefs when he named him special advisor?
- The Apollo Alliance claimed credit for writing the stimulus bill—why was this group allowed to write any portion of this bill?
- If politicians aren’t writing the bills and aren’t reading the bills, do they have any idea what these 1000 page plus bills actually impose on the American people?
- If the ‘public option’ health care plan is so good why won’t politicians agree to have that as their plan?
- If town hall meetings are intended for the politicians to learn what’s on our mind—why do they spend so much time talking instead of listening?
- Politicians are refusing to attend town hall meetings complaining, without evidence, that they are scripted. Does that mean we shouldn’t come out and vote for you since every campaign stop, baby kiss and speech you give is scripted?
- Why would you want to overwhelm the system?
- Is using the economic crises to rush legislation through congress what Rahm Emanuel meant when he talked about "not letting a crises go to waste"?
- What are the czars paid? What is the budget for their staffs/offices?
Let us all question with boldness. This is a government of "We the People" it is time that they answer to the people.
If you get a chance to attend a town hall soon, ask some of these questions and report on the answers that you get. I am interested in hearing the answers.
Friday, August 28, 2009
IMPORTANT: Be Sure To Watch Glenn Beck Tonight
Glenn Beck has been laying out his evidence against the Obama Administration for some truly scary things this past week, and tonight, he will be sharing info on how to combat the coming changes. So, please try to tune in to the show to see what he has to share. It comes on Fox News at 5pm and again at 2am. I have a feeling that this information will be truly valuable for our cause.
Stay safe and strong Patriots. There is an end to all this if we remain faithful to the Constitution and God's Holy Word.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
The One Word To Describe ObamaCare
David Janda, MD is a highly respected orthopedic surgeon and author. His office is located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, affiliated with St. Joseph Mercy Hospital. On July 17, 2009, he was asked to be the keynote speaker at a Congressional Dinner. Please read and consider this article he wrote and published regarding the proposed healthcare reform. If passed this legislation will affect us all!
THE ONE WORD TO DESCRIBE OBAMACARE
Written by Dr. Dave Janda
Thursday, 23 July 2009
As a physician who has authored books on preventative health care, I was given the opportunity to be the keynote speaker at a Congressional Dinner at The Capitol Building in Washington last Friday (7/17).
The presentation was entitled Health Care Reform, The Power & Profit of Prevention, and I was gratified that it was well received.
In preparation for the presentation, I read the latest version of "reform" as authored by The Obama Administration and supported by Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid. Here is the link to the 1,018 page document.
Let me summarize just a few salient points of the above plan. First, however, it should be clear that the same warning notice must be placed on The ObamaCare Plan as on a pack of cigarettes: Consuming this product will be hazardous to your health.
The underlying method of cutting costs throughout the plan is based on rationing and denying care. There is no focus on preventing health care need whatever. The plan's method is the most inhumane and unethical approach to cutting costs I can imagine as a physician.
The rationing of care is implemented through The National Health Care Board, according to the plan. This illustrious Board "will approve or reject treatment for patients based on the cost per treatment divided by the number of years the patient will benefit from the treatment."
Translation ... if you are over 65 or have been recently diagnosed as having an advanced form of cardiac disease or aggressive cancer ... dream on if you think you will get treated ... pick out your coffin.
Oh, you say this could never happen? Sorry ... this is the same model they use in Britain.
The plan mandates that there will be little or no advanced treatments to be available in the future. It creates The Federal Coordinating Council For Comparative Effectiveness Research, the purpose of which is "to slow the development of new medications and technologies in order to reduce costs." Yes, this is to be the law.
The plan also outlines that doctors and hospitals will be overseen and reviewed by The National Coordinator For Health Information and Technology.
This "coordinator" will "monitor treatments being delivered to make sure doctors and hospitals are strictly following government guidelines that are deemed appropriate." It goes on to say ... "Doctors and hospitals not adhering to guidelines will face penalties."
According to those in Congress, penalties could include large six figure financial fines and possible imprisonment.
So according to The ObamaCare Plan ... if your doctor saves your life you might have to go to the prison to see your doctor for follow-up appointments. I believe this is the same model Stalin used in the former Soviet Union. [my emphasis]
Section 102 has the Orwellian title, "Protecting the Choice to Keep Current Coverage." What this section really mandates is that it is illegal to keep your private insurance if your status changes - e.g., if you lose or change your job, retire from your job and become a senior, graduate from college and get your first job. Yes, illegal.
When Mr. Obama hosted a conference call with bloggers urging them to pressure Congress to pass his health plan as soon as possible, a blogger from Maine referenced an Investors Business Daily article that claimed Section 102 of the House health legislation would outlaw private insurance.
He asked: "Is this true? Will people be able to keep their insurance and will insurers be able to write new policies even though H.R. 3200 is passed?" Mr. Obama replied: "You know, I have to say that I am not familiar with the provision you are talking about." [Ok, Obama, then who the heck is you commie dirt bag!?]
Then there is Section 1233 of The ObamaCare Plan, devoted to "Advanced Care Planning." After each American turns 65 years of age they have to go to a mandated counseling program that is designed to end life sooner.
This session is to occur every 5 years unless the person has developed a chronic illness then it must be done every year. The topics in this session will include, "how to decline hydration, nutrition and how to initiate hospice care." It is no wonder The Obama Administration does not like my emphasis on Prevention. For Mr. Obama, prevention is the "enemy" as people would live longer.
I rest my case. The ObamaCare Plan is hazardous to the health of every American.
After I finished my Capitol Hill presentation, I was asked by a Congressman in the question-answer session: "I'll be doing a number of network interviews on the Obama Health Care Plan. If I am asked what is the one word to describe the plan what should I answer."
The answer is simple, honest, direct, analytical, sad but truthful. I told him that one word is FASCIST. [I like this Doctor very much!!]
Then I added, "I hope you'll have the courage to use that word, Congressman. No other word is more appropriate."
Dr. Dave Janda, MD, is an orthopedic surgeon, and a world-recognized expert on the prevention of sports injuries, particularly in children.
His website is noinjury.com.
BTW, for some of you who have not been watching the Glenn Beck show on Fox News this week, he brought something to my attention that I never thought of. Did you know that if Obama didn't write this or other bills, and none of our Senators or Congressmen wrote these bills (since they haven't read them we assume they are not guilty of this), who is writing these facist bills they are trying to pass on the American public??! You know who? One of them is the avowed Maxist Facist Radical Mr. Van Jones, for one. And many other of the Obama appointed "Czars" are avowed Marxists.
The Czars eco-skelton that's going to take over our government at the first sign of weakness.
Scared yet?
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Wordless Wednesday (08/25)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)