Sunday, March 24, 2013

Starbucks Does Not Support Traditional Marriage


Has most of the corporate world gone totally INSANE?! Now Starbucks doesn't want the business of people who believe in traditional marriage.
Breaking News From The TEA Party: Starbucks moves even farther left and tells traditional marriage supporters we don't want your business.

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz just said at their annual meeting that If you support traditional marriage, we don't want your business. He told a shareholder to sell his shares if he supported traditional marriage and didn't like Starbucks stance against it. So let's get this straight. If you support the 5000 year old tradition that marriage is between one man and one woman, you can't buy shares in his far left radical company that sells designer $7.00 Grande Decaf Lattes? Done! I'll take a Chick Fil-A and their 99 cent coffee instead.


Click on story to verify.
Well, they have every right, I guess, to turn away anyone they so desire. And I have every right to never use their products again!! Ever!

This is definately Satan's world until Christ returns to set up His just Kingdom.


1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God." 

Ephesians 6:12 - "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

2 comments:

Ron Russell said...

The CEO of Starbucks have a right to take any stand they see fit on any issue. That said the customers of Starbucks can take their business elsewhere if they so choose. That's the American way. But it really is quite unbelievabale that any company would take a stand against traditional marriage.

Red said...

About as unbelievable as a presidential administration doing so? What's unbelievable is that Prop 8 went to the supreme court. The majority voted no to Prop 8. An activist judge who should have recused himself from the case overturned the majority vote. That's unconstitutional as all get out.